Review of Cavan Kerry Press

When looking at the Cavan Kerry Press website, I immediately was drawn to the accessibility of the website and the way it was visually pleasing. The first aspect I noticed when I looked at the mission statement that stood out to me, was the fact that they noted how they wanted to “bring CavanKerry books and writers to diverse audiences.” I have never before seen a mission statement that contained an element of outreach. Usually, missions just seem to talk about the magazine or press itself, not how they hope to reach the community, but the fact that Cavan Kerry shows both of these aspects, is very interesting and shows how interested they are in building a community through their press. They also, within the first sentence of their brief mission statement, say that they are dedicated to “art and community.” This is a precursor to the final statement that I mentioned, in that at Cavan Kerry, the art they are producing is just as important as the community they plan to reach with that art.

After reading the mission statement, I expected to see an even more embellished description of the way this press serves their community in the “Community page,” but I was still surprised to see the immense ways that this press is so selfless in what they do for the community. Similar to what was touched upon in class when Gabby and Spencer talked about their magazine/press, there are certain people who find it more important to get the word they want to share out to the public, than to get the financial benefits from publishing these words. This is just the mission that Cavan Kerry Press seems to live by, they want to allow people to read their books so they have free readings and even give away free books to people who cannot afford it. I looked at The Waiting Room Reader and I loved this idea of the press giving away these free magazines to hospitals and waiting rooms. This proves the extent that Cavan Kerry just wants the community to read because they believe books are that important. I love this philosophy and was inspired by this idea. I cannot wait to hear her speak in class!

Publishing Case Study 3: The Paris Review and The Missouri Review

From reading the “About Me” page in the Paris Review I immediately was interested by the fact that it said from the beginning that it wanted to be an outlet from the usual literary critiques that plague so much writing. Being in a literary theory class this semester, I thought it was especially interesting that this organization wants to put this type of writing “in the back of the book where it belongs.” But then, it was ironic that while this is part of their mission, this review has also been the first to publish some major literary critics such as Adrienne Rich and many other works that have appeared in anthologies. In this regard, it reminded me of McSweeny’s in the way that while it began trying to be anti-mainstream, it is now in ways the definition of the canon. My favorite part of this Review was the Interview page where it allowed authors to talk about the processes of their work. Having a love for writing, I am very interested in the lives of writers, so I felt that this page was effective. Also looking through the back issues and archives, this magazine seems to be very high class and established in the way the website and magazine is set up. It was very interesting and impressive to be able to look at back issues all the way dating back to the 1950s. There is no wonder that this magazine is credited and it is well deserved because it contains a rich history that I think is nicely depicted.

The Missouri Review website was similar to the Paris Review in the way that the back issue content and “About Me” reveals how established the magazine is and how many of the works published have been later anthologized. It was interesting though how I felt that more with this magazine than the previous, that TMR wanted to keep up with modern times through a fun and lively home page and covers of their magazines. It was also a little less convienient to search through these back issues because there was not a neat timeline that revealed their long history like the previous Review, instead you had to continuously click the “older issues” tab if you wanted to reach these older issues. I did enjoy the organization of the “Genre” page that allows viewers to choose the exact type of writing they prefer and be directed to those pieces. Also, there was availability more than any other website I saw recently to search the archives based on the genre or issue, I thought this was a great way to legitimize the Review and make it easier to access since there is so much content involved.

Case Study 2: Creative Nonfiction, Southeast Review, and McSweeney’s

While looking at these three different literary websites, it was interesting to think about the idea of what is the glue that holds each one together. For Creative Non-Fiction, I found that a value that seemed especially important to them was education. In the “About” section the emphasis on allowing the community to be educated as well as providing the opprutunity to be published was especially inspiring. I saw these values really come to life in the fact that beneath the area where the foundation is describing the different outlets they provide, such as the Magazine and the In Fact Books, there was also a section below that described the whole genre of creative non-fiction in a very beautiful way, comparing it to having as many elements as “jazz music.” IF i had to define the glue of the website as stated in this quote, “to broaden the genre’s impact in the literary arena by providing an array of educational services and publishing activities,” I was also able to find more concrete examples of how this foundation is run based off of these values. There was an entire page dedicated to Education itself where there was information about mentoring for beginning writers, online classes, internships and volunteer positions. For these reasons, I would characterize much of this community as aiming to the audience of younger, student and beginning writers who want a safe space to work and create and perfect their craft. This community as a whole seemed like a space to allow this to happen. In the News and Newsletters page, there was even information about Conferences to attend and an “Artists Wanted” event.

The Southeast Review community came off as slightly different than the Creative Non-Fiction, for one reason being that the former is one literary outlet, a national literary magazine that is housed in a University, while the latter has multiple outlets for writing. The mission statement found in the Masthead page for this magazine reads that it’s goal is to  “present emerging writers on the same stage as well-established ones.” It is interesting that this may seem very similar to Creative Non-Fiction’s core values, however, from the website information, I found that this magazine goes about creating their community in different ways. A large value that seems to glue this community together is finding commonality among many differences. Another quote from the masthead reads, “we strive to publish work that is representative of our diverse interests and aesthetics, and we celebrate the eclectic mix this produces.” This portion of their mission seems to be what actually characterizes the community more so than the previous quote. I read through a couple of stories in the back issue content of the magazine and I could tell that their work reflected the want to combine a mixture of ethnic rich and travel related pieces. I also liked how they had a page dedicated to links to other literary journals, this made it seem as though this magazine is very interested in getting the public to read and discover a large mix of writing. Saying this, I would say that this organization is slightly less effective for the audience of promoting young writers to contribute than Creative Non-Fiction. However, I would say that this magazine appeals to an audience who is interested in stories from other countries and cultures because as they state, “sixty members on our editorial staff who come from throughout the country and the world.” This is a very interesting statistic which brings in a new world of diversity in writing.

In World of Publishing I with professor Davis, I was introduced to McSweeny’s, therefore I was glad to get the chance to really delve more deeply into the website and find out what holds this eccentric publishing company together. I would say that this organization probably has the least amount of concern, relative to the other two I have studied, to appealing to the new writer community. I would label the audience that they most target as quirky, different artists whose work does not quite fit into the neat and tidy categories that other companies and journals might offer. I thought it was interesting to look at the differences in how “The Lucky Peach” “The Believer” and “The Wholphin” seem at first glance like very different magazines, all from the same organization. They seem to all retain the core value of eccentric and quirky statement pieces of writing, but with the more class and recognition the company gained, the need for a more classic looking magazine arose. However, I did see evidence of reaching out to the writing community with the 862 Tutoring Centers page with information about Conferences and seminars about poetry. The page about the VAD Foundation states that it is “working to increase access to education in post-conflict South Sudan by building schools, libraries, teacher-training institutes, and community centers.” This is another indication of McSweeny’s reaching out beyond its borders.

 

Publishing Case Study 1: The Rumpus, The Millions, and HTML Giant

After searching through these three literary outlet websites, I feel that I gained a lot of knowledge about the ways groups of people can share their insights, critiques and thoughts about books, blogs, big topics or small issues facing the literary world. As a whole, reading through this content revitalized my enthusiasm and positivity in the literary world by showing me that it is still very much alive and flourishing, whether it is online or in print.

Out of these three, in my opinion, The Millions seems to be of the most value. The criteria that I based this off of, included mostly the information that they included in the “About” section of their website. In none of the other two websites did I see a specific page dedicated to explaining their “mission” in a way and a bit about their background and history. Although the blog posts and stories may have been more interesting and youthful on the Rumpus and HTML Giant, I found myself the most impressed with the credentials that the Millions listed. This included the fact that they have been featured on NPR and mentioned by The New York Times, The Los Angeles Times, and The Village Voice. I am aware that the higher “status” of these big names in the industry are influencing my opinion, and in theory I would like to be on the side of even smaller literary outlets so that they might too gain fame (not that these two other are small), however, the way that The Millions seemed the most established influenced my opinion. I enjoyed how they had a variety of things to read such as book reviews and recent articles that featured not so recent pieces such as “Wasteland.” I also found it impressive that they are beginning to create their own ebooks on “a variety of unusual topics.”

I learned that the writing and publishing community is one that is very welcoming and always reaching out for support, love and additions from the public. I saw a very high and strong connection with the publications and the reader because they appeared, especially HTML Giant, to be very reader and internet friendly and laid back as if anyone can give their opinion and voice their thoughts on different books and other issues. I also really loved to see how the Rumpus had a page dedicated to Events that they hold throughout the community. These launch parties and the event called “Letters of Written Correspondence” seem to really bring writers and readers together for people to enjoy the written word.

Looking through these event pages made me think about how each of these publications would support themselves financially. Perhaps the Rumpus makes money by charging admission to these events they hold. Also I saw how in order to be a member of the Rumpus Book Club there is a 25$ a month fee. The Millions actually lists 5 ways that readers can support the Millions since they pay their writers and their staff. These ways include donating, subscribing, advertising and making a bookmark on Amazon.com. The HTML Giant seemed to give the least insight into how they might support themselves, but I would guess that perhaps they encourage donations and subscriptions and prizes as well.

 

 

AWP Conference

After looking through the booklet for the AWP conference, I could see how it would be a challenge to decide how to best spend your time there, since there is so much activity and workshops to learn from! One of the panels that interested me that I would want to attend is titled “Using Careless Speech for Careful Writing–The Art of Using Unplanned and Casual Language to Convey Style and Meaning.” This interests me because one of the exercises will involve a writing prompt that uses unplanned speech for the basis of a story or poem. In all my years of having to carefully structure essays and sentences, I would be interesting in learning about this technique! The second panel I would attend would be “The Translation Workshop: A student perspective” I would be interested in attending this panel because it has a focus on what students think about the workshop process. Having been in many workshops in my undergrad experience, I would love to hear about others experiences and see how a workshop in a graduate program might be. The third panel that seems very close to what I have been leaning towards writing about which is why I would love to attend is “The Art of Healing: Writing About Illness from both sides of the Curtain.” I have written some essays about illness and would love to write more and I think this panel and workshop would be very beneficial!

Comment on “Review Review”

I was thrilled by the first page of the “Review Review” that commented on the fact that short stories are supposed to be making a comeback and that this can only be god news for literary magazines and writers alike! I then followed many of the links on the pages that sparked my attention. The first was “What does it Mean to be a Working Writer?” This article contained inspirational advice and tidbits on how to make yourself known in the writing world and how to make a career out of a passion that you have. I enjoyed the practical advice concerning how to find a good agent as well as the lesson to “stop taking pity on yourself.” I find that I often enjoy articles and people who treat the writing profession just like any other career, it takes practice, know-how and courage to put yourself out there. I also enjoyed the link to “17 Essays by Female Writers That Everyone Should Read” since I am talking a lot about feminism and female writers in my Literary Theory class. I will be sure to read some of these in the future! But I think that my favorite link was the article titled “Why I Edit: A Love Story.” I loved the end where the author and editor talked about how she felt that editing was her way of serving the community that gave her so much, and a way to deal with the hardships of her past. This made me realize all of the things I love about writing, such as when she talked about walking in to the English class and knowing she found her “tribe.” I can relate on many levels to this piece and it was truly touching!

Tough Stuff

After editing two very different pieces for the upcoming dogwood issue, I found that there were things that I missed and I am realizing how intricate and detail-oriented the editing process is. I realize that I need to go over and look back and all of the grammar rules that I have learned so long ago. These type of things used to be fresh in my memory, but since college, I find that I have forgotten some essential rules of common grammar. I do not want to miss this give away things in a piece of writing. Also, I am realizing that you need to do a good amount of research and Googling during the editing process, which I need to do more often if I am unsure of anything. As I have mentioned before, I think it would be helpful if I read over multiple times that story that I am editing so that I am more focused on the details of sentence structure.

My Strengths and Weaknesses as a Copy Editor

I believe that through this process of editing two pieces of the Dogwood journal as well as now analyzing what I liked best about my work-shopping, I can hone in on my strengths and weaknesses. I find that my weakness would be my inclination to like what I am reading and to not want to find flaws within the piece. Also, I tend to focus on the big picture of the story or poem and have a harder time focusing on the more minute details such as grammar issues and things of that sort. I think that a way of overcoming these weaknesses I can practice reading the work over a few times as a whole, just taking in the story alone, so that I become more familiar with it. Then, once I am comfortable with the piece I can heavily focus on the line by line changes that need to be made. I think that my strengths of copy editing are being able to see many errors even on my first reading of the piece. I am glad that all my schooling in English has allowed me to catch the big issues in a piece even on a smaller, sentence structure level. I also think my strength is that I am very meticulous with my work and I want it to be thorough and correct, therefore I will Google and research anything I am unsure of in order to find the correct answer. I am concerned with how neat and organized a piece looks to the eye, therefore I want any work that I edit to be up to this standard.

My experience of editing

I have not had much previous experience with editing, which is why I was so thrilled to be able to learn a good amount of skills from this World of Publishing II class. I was in the World of Publishing I class, where I primarily looked at poetry. This class was more a look at writing from a far away standpoint, not a close reading and fixing issues view. Also, I work at the Writing Center here at Fairfield. I would not say that I “edit” the work of students so much, but I do look for major grammatical errors, such as spelling, punctuation and sentence structure. I also look at the big picture of the work to see if the essay flows and the ideas are in the order that they should be. In last semester’s class with Sonya, Creative Non-Fiction, where I was able to workshop my peer’s stories, it was the same basic process which I love–being able to read other people’s work and make comments about it. My only other experience with editing besides these at Fairfield occurred when I shadowed at University Business Magazine with the Managing Editor. I overlooked the work she did with In-Design and I saw how busy the life of an editor can be!

Comment about my Favorite Entry from Dogwood 2011

The Memory of Forgetting by Salita S. Bryant was my favorite submission of the Dogwood 2012 collection. I recall being fond of this poem when I read it in my previous class last semester, World of Publishing I. I enjoy the fact that the title and the poem itself is a bit of a paradox, yet it still makes sense because of the true to life experiences that the author draws light upon. The images are beautiful in the fact that they are also sad. Although I have not personally been through some of the experiences yet, I thought it was a great technique the way the author put her emotions on the line and made us feel what she feels.